Friday, November 14, 2003
300 Yost Hall
Talk: 4:00 -- 5:00 p.m.
Refreshments: 3:30 -- 4:00 p.m. in 300
Yost
Model selection criteria for categorical data pose a challenge to the
discreteness of the data structure and the properties attributable to
discrete data models. In this presentation, I propose a general Bayesian
criterion for model assessment for categorical data called the weighted L
measure, which is constructed from the posterior predictive distribution
of the data. The measure is based on weighting the observations according
to their covariate values, which is crucial for categorical data. In
addition, the weight component plays the role of penalty term on the
dimension of the model. Thus the weight parameter partially controls the
magnitude of the penalty term in the criterion and this often! results in
better performance compared to the other methods for model
comparison. In addition, we show that the weighted quadratic L measure is
more attractive than the deviance loss L measure for categorical data. A
detailed simulation study is presented to examine the performance of
the weighted L measure, and is compared to other established methods
such as AIC, BIC and DIC. Finally, a real data set using a bivariate
ordinal response model is used to further illustrate the proposed
methodology.
This is a joint work with M-H. Chen and J. Ibrahim